Compactly Choquet-complete spaces I: LCS-complete and Gδ subspaces

A Choquet-complete space is one in which player α has a winning strategy in the strong Choquet game. By winning, it is meant that the intersection of all the open sets played by α is non-empty. If you change the winning condition to “the open sets played by α form a neighborhood base of a point”, then you get the convergence Choquet-complete spaces of Dorais and Mummert. I will embark on a study of compactly Choquet-complete spaces, where the winning condition is “the open sets played by α form a neighborhood base of a non-empty compact set”. These were introduced by M. de Brecht, X. Jia, Zh. Lyu, and me a few years ago. In this first part, I will show that all locally compact sober space are compactly Choquet-complete, and that the class of compactly Choquet-complete spaces is closed under taking Gδ subspaces. I will take the opportunity to fill in a few gaps in the original paper, and to make precise one or two techniques in topological game theory. Read the full post.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Compactly Choquet-complete spaces I: LCS-complete and Gδ subspaces

Proper maps, quasi-adjoints and the Smyth hyperspace

This month, I would like to talk about proper maps, a nifty equivalent characterization through something I call quasi-adjoints and which involves the Smyth hyperspace monad, with a few non-trivial applications. Read the full post.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Proper maps, quasi-adjoints and the Smyth hyperspace

Bitopological spaces, d-frames, and Jung-Moshier duality

Stone duality is an adjunction between the category Top of topological spaces and the category Loc of locales, namely the opposite of the category Frm of frames. Is there a similar-looking adjunction between the category biTop of bitopological spaces—namely, sets with two topologies instead of just one—and some category of order-theoretic structures? Well, yes, of course. My preferred one is due to Achim Jung and M. Andrew Moshier, later studied and refined by Tomáš Jakl in his PhD thesis. Read the full post.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Bitopological spaces, d-frames, and Jung-Moshier duality

All countable continuous dcpos are algebraic

A little pearl this month: as the title says, all countable continuous dcpos are algebraic. Read the full post.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on All countable continuous dcpos are algebraic

Jimmie Lawson’s compact interval theorem

We will see a relatively recent theorem of Jimmie Lawson’s: consider a locally compact space X with a semiclosed ordering ≤, and a closed connected chain C inside X; then every closed interval inside C is compact in X. The proof is perhaps surprising, as it relies on Koch’s arc theorem. Read the full post.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Jimmie Lawson’s compact interval theorem

Koch’s arc theorem

Koch’s arc theorem is a famous theorem saying that, under a few conditions, given any point x of an open subset U of a pospace (X, ≤), one can draw an arc chain from some point on the boundary of U to x. The conditions are that: (i) the closure of U should be compact and (ii) U should not contain any local minimum. That may seem clear: starting from x, go down inside U, and continue forever; this cannot stop while in U because U has no local minimum, hence must go all the way to its boundary. The actual proof requires quite some ingenuity, and builds the desired arc chain as a maximal chain for an ordering that is itself minimal in some well-crafted family, using Zorn’s Lemma twice. Read the full post.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Koch’s arc theorem

Arcs and arc chains II: every arc is an arc chain

Last time, we have seen that every arc chain is an arc. This month, we will see that every arc is an arc chain. The proof proceeds by inventing a suitable partial ordering, the cut-point ordering. We will also see that all second-countable arcs (or arc-chains) are isomorphic, in particular they are all isomorphic to [0, 1], and that there are non-second-countable arcs (or arc-chains) of the same cardinality that are not isomorphic. Read the full post.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Arcs and arc chains II: every arc is an arc chain

Arcs and arc chains

Jimmie Lawson had presented some results about chains in partially ordered spaces at the ISDT conference in 2022, which I wanted to talk about. But this requires Koch’s arc theorem, so I decided to talk about the latter first. That theorem is about arcs, and I decided to explain a few basic things about arcs, and their close cousins, the arc chains. This topic expanded so much that, in the end, this is the only thing I will talk about this month. In short: every arc chain is an arc, and arc chains can be characterized purely order theoretically. Read the full post.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Arcs and arc chains

When is ℒ(X) locally compact? II. The non-consonant case and the non-second-countable case

Last month, we have seen that ℒ(X) is locally compact in its Scott topology (equivalently, core-compact, equivalently, stably compact) if and only if OX is locally compact in its Scott topology (equivalently, core-compact, equivalently, stably compact), and that those properties are equivalent to X being core-compact, provided that X is a poset with its Scott topology or a ⊙-consonant second-countable space. Matthew de Brecht observed that the latter condition can be relaxed. We will see that we only need X to be second-countable or consonant for the equivalence to hold. Read the full post.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on When is ℒ(X) locally compact? II. The non-consonant case and the non-second-countable case

When is ℒ(X) locally compact?

Let ℒ(X) be the dcpo of all lower semicontinuous maps from a space X to R+ ∪ {∞}. We give it the Scott topology. Under which conditions on X is it locally compact? We will see that this happens exactly when X is core-compact, in two situations: when X is a poset with its Scott topology, and when X is an ⊙-consonant second countable space. I don’t know anything outside of these two cases. The case of posets has a remarkably short and clever proof, due to Xiaodong Jia. The case of ⊙-consonant second countable spaces has a much more tortuous proof, and relies on deep properties of hyperspaces discovered by Matthew de Brecht and Tatsuji Kawai. Read the full post.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on When is ℒ(X) locally compact?